ABSTRACT
AIM: To assess the cancer awareness in respondents, their knowledge about the nature of cancer as a disease, its diagnosis and treatment, warning signs, environmental risk factors and conceptions of how risk factors work, as well as willingness to participate in screening programs if available. METHODOLOGY: Cancer awareness is an increasingly important issue in light of increasing incidence and associated healthcare costs, as well as the presence of risk management strategies. In this study, 453 people, drawn from several educational institutes/workplaces, were surveyed with respect to cancer awareness. The test sample included pre university students, undergraduates, and postgraduate students/workers. We checked for variations in cancer awareness across multiple educational levels to determine whether there was variation in levels of cancer awareness across educational classes. RESULTS: We found that confidence in perception of cancer awareness, and awareness itself, was not very high, and only postgraduates had a nuanced appreciation of some of the complexities of cancer epidemiology, and even then only moderately. CONCLUSION: The conclusions of the study point towards the need for optimal policymaking in the development of cancer awareness in the population.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Viral hepatitis is a major public health problem in India. AIM: To investigate the association of various hepatitis viruses in patients with acute liver diseases in north India. METHODS: One hundred and thirteen patients with acute viral hepatitis (AVH; n = 70) or fulminant hepatic failure (FHF; N = 43) were evaluated for the presence of hepatitis A, B, C and E virus infection. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing was done using second-generation anti-HCV ELISA test and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of HCV RNA in the serum of patients with non-A, non-B (NANB) hepatitis. Detection of IgM anti-HEV antibody was done in patients found negative for the above viruses (n = 53). RESULTS: Hepatitis A and B viruses accounted for 3.5% and 42.5% of the 113 cases, respectively. HCV infection accounted for 12% of the NANB cases with AVH and 15.5% with FHF. PCR was more useful than serological tests for the detection of HCV infection. HEV infection accounted for 49% of the NANB, non-C cases with AVH and 25% with FHF; pregnant women with HEV infection had a fulminant course. No etiological agent could be established in 28.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: HEV is the most important cause of NANB hepatitis; hepatitis B virus is still a major concern, while HCV is not an important cause of acute viral liver disease in India.